JUDGMENT Per Deepak Gupta, J. 1. By means of this review petition the petitioners seek review of the judgement dated 2.1.2012 passed in LPA No. 109 of 2008 and Cross Objections No. 125 of 2008. 2. The main ground for seeking review is that the Court has not considered the judgement of the Division Bench of this Court rendered in Amar Nath and another versus State of H.P. and others 2002(1) Shim.L.C.236. We would like to make it clear that at the time of arguments this judgement was not cited before us. In any event, in this judgement it has been held that an aggrieved party is entitled to invoke revisional powers of the State Government under Section 54 of the H.P.Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) even if the said party has not exhausted the statutory remedies available to him. 3. As far as the present case is concerned this judgement is not applicable in the present case. The petitioners did not file any objection against repartition of the land and no specific order was challenged by him before the State Government. From the facts placed on record it is also obvious that it is only after a civil suit was filed against the petitioners, wherein they were restrained from raising construction on the land in question, they filed the petition before the Director Consolidation. Therefore, the learned Single Judge was justified in holding that no revision was maintainable since no order was under challenge. This Court has also held that Director can only call for the records of any proceedings and set aside any order. It is, therefore, but necessary that there should be an order which is under challenge before the Director. We find no error apparent on the face of the record. The review petition being without merit is accordingly dismissed.