JUDGMENT Mrs. Sabina, J.:- Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’ for short) challenging the order dated 5.9.2013 whereby charges were ordered to be framed against the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner had been falsely involved in this case. In fact, bribe money had not been demanded or accepted by the petitioner. Petitioner had been transferred on 27.6.2013 and thereafter, the FIR in question was registered on 29.6.2013. 3. Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 19.6.2013, petitioner and his co-accused Inspector Ashok Kumar had inspected the factory of the complainant. After inspection, petitioner and his co-accused told the complainant that their record was not complete and they should complete the same. They had further told that they would again inspect the factory on 25.6.2013. Thereafter on 29.6.2013, Ashok Kumar came to the factory and said that the record had not been completed by the complainant. He demanded Rs. 15,000/- as bribe from the complainant for himself as well as the petitioner. Complainant paid Rs. 10,000/- to Ashok Kumar. Now petitioner was demanding Rs. 5,000/- from the complainant. On the basis of the statement of the complainant, formal FIR was registered. 4. After through investigation of the case, challan has been presented against the petitioner. 5. Whether the petitioner had the occasion to demand bribe from the complainant or not, as alleged in the FIR, can be gone into during trial. At the time of framing of the charges, Trial Court was only required to see as to whether prima facie case was made out against the accused for framing of the charges. In the present case, prima facie there was sufficient material to frame charges against the petitioner. The plea taken by the petitioner that he had been transferred on 27.6.2013 can be gone into by the Trial Court during trial as petitioner might have been transferred vide Annexure P-5 but he may not have yet relinquished the charge at the time of registration of FIR. No ground for interference is made out. Dismissed. ----------------------