JUDGMENT 1. - The instant misc. petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of the F.I.R. No. 429/2013, registered at the Police Station Nohar, Distt. Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 323, 354 and 34 I.P.C. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned F.I.R. has been against the petitioners for wreaking vengeance. He contends that the complainant is working under one Pawan Kumar with whom the petitioners are at litigation. He submits that earlier on proceedings under Sections 107, 116(3) and 151 Cr.P.C. were initiated against the petitioners on the basis of a complaint filed by the complainant-respondent No. 2. Thereafter, a belated F.I.R. was filed by the complainant-respondent No. 2 against the petitioners for the very same incident. Learned counsel submits that the impugned F.I.R. filed against the petitioners is mala fide and a gross abuse of the process of the Court. He thus prays that the impugned F.I.R. deserves to be quashed. 3. Having heard and considered the arguments advanced at the bar and upon perusal of the impugned F.I.R. it is apparent that the complainant has made a grievance about continuous offending acts of the accused and filed a complaint against them. When the action upon the complaint did not fructify, then the complainant filed the F.I.R. on 8.8.2013 against the petitioners. In the opinion of this Court, it cannot be said that the F.I.R. impugned does not disclose any cognizable offence against the petitioners so as to quash the same by exercising inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 4. Resultantly, the misc. petition as well as the stay petition being bereft of any force are hereby dismissed. 5. However, the petitioners shall be at liberty to file a proper representation before the I.O. It is expected that the I.O. shall take the representation into consideration filed by the petitioners if any before filing the result of the investigation.Petition dismissed. *******