Brijesh Kumar Srivastava-II, J.— Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and have perused the record. It is submitted by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. It is further submitted that the accused-applicant does not have any criminal history, as averred in para 11 of the affidavit and she is languishing in jail since 1.5.2013. It is also submitted that accused-applicant is not likely to abscond or tamper with the prosecution evidence. It is lastly submitted that co-accused Smt. Rani Kanjar has been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 18.06.2013 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 16716 of 2013. Learned AGA opposed the bail prayer of the applicant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I think it appropriate to release the applicant on bail. Let the applicant, Smt Anita involved in Case Crime No. 132 of 2013, under section 21/22 of N.D.P.S.Act, P.S. Kidwai Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions; (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurise/intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed. (iv) The applicant shall report to the police station concerned in the first week of each month to show her good conduct and behavior. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. _____________