Het Singh Yadav, J.— Memorandum of appearance filed today by Sri R.K. Singh, learned counsel for the complainant is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant who is a woman, has been falsely implicated in this case because of previous hostility. A civil dispute and criminal cases already pending between the complainant and the applicant. Thus, the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case simply just to wrack vengeance against her. The F.I.R. was lodged after one week of the incident disclosing therein that co-accused persons had enticed away the minor daughter of the complainant. The applicant has been assigned no role except the general allegations of helping the main accused. Except the alleged 2-3 mobile calls said to have been made from the mobile of the applicant to the main accused two days prior to the missing of the complainant's daughter, there is no credible prima facie evidence showing complicity of the applicant in the alleged conspiracy, she is in jail without committing any offence since 17.04.2013 and is a woman therefore deserves to be enlarged on bail. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the complainant strongly repudiates the submission made as above. Learned counsel for the complainant contended that as per call details of the moble phone of the applicant it appears that she had made phone calls to main accused namely Sunny Rajbhar prior to the occurrence. It is also contended that the accused Sunny Rajbhar was staying at house of the applicant prior to the occurrence. Considering the points pertaining to the nature of accusation, prima facie satisfaction regarding proposed evidence and severity of punishment raised as above by the learned counsel of both the sides and on perusal of record, the court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail for the following reasons: (a) The applicant has not been assigned any direct role in the occurrence and she has been booked in this case under section 120-B IPC. At this stage there is no credible evidence to establish the allegations of the criminal conspiracy against the applicant. (b) It is simply alleged that she helped the main accused in enticing away the minor daughter of the complainant. At this stage there is no credible evidence to establish the allegations of the criminal conspiracy against the applicant. (b) It is simply alleged that she helped the main accused in enticing away the minor daughter of the complainant. (c) The complainant had an animosity with the applicant a woman, due to civil dispute. Let the applicant, Smt. Sangeeta Singh who is involved in case crime No. 207 of 2013, under sections 363, 366, 120-B IPC, Police Station-Shahganj, District-Jaunpur be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her to disclose such facts to the Court or to any other authority. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the court on the date fixed for hearing in the case and will co-operate in the trial. In case of unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, she shall immediately give intimation to the court concerned through counsel and request be made to the trial court that she may be permitted to be present through counsel. (iii) She will not misuse the liberty of the bail and will not repeat any such instance in future. Deviation of any of the above conditions shall entail cancellation of bail. The trial court shall decide the case expeditiously uninfluenced by the observations made hereinabove. _____________