Pankaj Naqvi, J.— Heard Shri Dharam Veer Singh, learned counsel for the informant and the learned A.G.A. for the State. It is contended that the applicant is a lady who has no previous criminal history and that on a deed alleged as Rahan Dakhali executed by the informant on 20.11.2009 a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- was advanced to her (Annexure-4). As the informant defaulted to repay the amount the applicant asserted his ownership rights over the property in dispute in terms of the said deed. Learned counsel for the informant has denied the execution of the said deed as it is contended that applicant had obtained her photographs along with money about three years ago on the pretext that the said documents are required for widow pension of the informant. Learned counsel for the informant does not dispute that widow pension is being granted to the informant. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application. Let the applicant Smt. Meera Devi involved in Case Crime No.47 of 2013 under Sections 420,471,504 and 506 I.P.C. Police Station Jalesar District Etah be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned withe the following conditions; (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.. (ii) The applicant will not pressurise/intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii)The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed. (iv) The applicant shall report to the police station concerned in the first week of each month to show his good conduct and behaviour. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. _____________