Het Singh Yadav, J.— The applicant, who alleged to have been involved in the Case Crime No.17 of 2013 under Sections 489-A, 489-B, 489-C I.P.C., Police Station-Garh Mukteshwar, District-Hapur, has moved this application to enlarge him on bail 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that police have concocted the entire theme of this case and foisted a false recovery upon the applicant just to make a show of its good work. The allegations in the F.I.R., even if, they taken to be correct and accepted in their entirety did not prima facie constitute the offence punishable under Section 489-A and 489-B I.P.C. The only allegations against the applicant are that he was found in possession of counterfeit currency notes. Thus, it is hardly a case under Section 489-C a bailable offence. The applicant, who is in jail since 11.1.2013 deserves to be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. repudiates the submission made as above and contended that the applicant was found in possession of 91 counterfeit notes of 1,000 denomination from the possession of the applicant. The I.O. has collected prima facie evidence that the applicant is engaged in anti national activity of transportation of counterfeit currency. Therefore, the bail application is liable to be rejected. 5. Having given my thoughtful considerations to the points pertaining to the nature of accusation, prima facie satisfaction regarding proposed evidence and severity of punishment raised as above by the learned counsel of both the sides and on perusal of record, I am of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail for the following reasons: (a) As per F.I.R. version itself it appears to be a case of simple possession of counterfeit notes. (b) There is no public witness of the alleged recovery. 6. Let applicant-Saddam involved in the Case Crime No. 17 of 2013 under Sections 489-A, 489-B, 489-C I.P.C., Police Station-Garh Mukteshwar, District-Hapur be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions that: (i) The applicant will mark his attendance at Police Station-concerned once in the first week of every calendar month during the trial. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the Court or to any other authority. (iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Court on the dates fixed for hearing in the case and will co-operate in the trial. In case of unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he shall immediately give intimation to the court concerned through counsel and request be made to the trial court that he may be permitted to be present through counsel. (iv) He will not mis-use the liberty of the bail and will not repeat any such instance in future. 7. Deviation of any of the above conditions shall entail cancellation of bail. 8. The trial court shall decide the case expeditiously uninfluenced by the observations made herein above. _____________