JUDGMENT 1. - By this revision petition filed under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 {hereinafter to be referred as the Act'}, challenge has been made to the order dated 01st August 2013 passed by the learned Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Alwar In FIR No. 714/2012 of Police Station, Bhiwadi, Alwar whereby the application for grant of bail moved on behalf of the petitioner has been rejected and that of the order dated 13th September 2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Alwar in Criminal Appeal No. 247/2013, by which the appeal preferred on behalf of the petitioner has been dismissed. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 3. It was been the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no material available on the record to justify declining bail to the petitioner, who was juvenile at the time of commission of the offence. It is further contended that the gravity of the offence committed cannot be a ground to decline the bail. It is also contended that the courts below without taking into consideration the mandatory provisions of the Act, in a cursory manner declined ball to the petitioner. It has also been submitted that the co-accused Kasam Khan has already been released on ball by this Court. 4. On the other hand the learned Public Prosecutor contended that looking to the gravity of the offence the petitioner should not be given indulgence of ball. 5. I have carefully considered the submissions made before me and have also perused the provisions of the Act. 6. Form the perusal of Section 12 of the Act, it is clear that a juvenile can be denied bail only when it comes out that the release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his release would defeat the ends of justice. On perusal of the facts available on the record and the report of the Protection (sic. Probation) Officer as stated by the learned Public Prosecutor, I do not I find any of such case is made out to deny benefit of bail. 7. In view of the aforesaid, I am inclined to accept this petition and I accordingly, the impugned orders are quashed and set aside. Probation) Officer as stated by the learned Public Prosecutor, I do not I find any of such case is made out to deny benefit of bail. 7. In view of the aforesaid, I am inclined to accept this petition and I accordingly, the impugned orders are quashed and set aside. The petitioner is I ordered to be released on bail. 8. Accordingly, the juvenile namely Javed son of Hakamdeen @ Hakim be released on ball in FIR No. 714/2012 registered at Police Station Bhiwadijj District-Alwar for offence under Secs. 394, 307 34 IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before the court concerned on all subsequent dates of hearing and as & when called upon to do so. 9. The revision petition is allowed accordingly.Revision Allowed. *******