JUDGMENT :- 1. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order of the Respondent dated 10.05.2013 refusing to accord permission to the Petitioner to conduct dance programme on 05.06.2013. 2. A cursory perusal of the impugned order passed by the Respondent shows that the same is liable to be set aside on the simple ground that the said order is not a speaking and reasonable one assigning qualitative and quantitative details, while rejecting the request of the Petitioner to conduct the cultural/dance/drama programme. 3. It is to be pointed out that an Administrative Order passed by the Respondent/Authority must contain reasons while deciding the Application or Petition on merits in one way or other. An order without assigning reasons may be just and fair from the point of view of a person who passed the same, but to an aggrieved or affected, the same is an unjust and illegal order. In short, an order passed by the Competent Authority by mentioning reasons thereto will give an appearance of Justice. 4. In view of the fact that the impugned order of the Respondent suffers from patent illegality in the eye of law, this Court, in the interest of Justice, sets aside the same and consequently, allows the instant Writ Petition. Also, this Court directs the Respondent to consider the claim of the Petitioner to conduct the cultural/dance/drama programme prescribing conditions viz., that the Petitioner shall not conduct any indecent programme that would not cause inconvenience to the general public. Such a decision is to be necessarily taken by the Respondent at the earliest, in any event on or before 05.06.2013. 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.