JUDGMENT 1. - Contention of the learned counsel for petitioner is that the main allegation of rape has been made against Durgesh by the prosecutrix. Petitioner has been named as an accused at the instance of one Gaffar, who also runs a private clinic in village Jargah. Petitioner also runs a private clinic. It is on account of the professional rivalry that petitioner has been named as an accused at his instance. Father of the prosecutrix Mohd.Hussain (PW5) has in cross-examination categorically admitted that it was Gaffar, who instigated him to name Akhatar Ali saying that Akhatar Ali has defamed his daughter in the village. He stated that Akhatar Ali was engaged in social service and that he resides in the village with his wife and four children. Petitioner is in jail since 19/7/2012. He has no criminal antecedents. Trial may take long. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application but could not rebut the aforesaid submissions. 3. Considering the submissions made at the bar, the nature of accusation, the materials on record and all other facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 4. In the result, this fourth bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Akhatar Ali S/o Mustkim Fakeer shall be released on bail in FIR No. 219/2012 Police Station Khanpur, District Jhalawar for offence u/S.376 IPC on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing until conclusion of the trial.Application allowed. *******