JUDGMENT S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. The petitioner claims to be the husband of one Mallika, aged 20 years. According to the petitioner, the marriage was celebrated on 03.12.2012. After the marriage, they were living together as husband and wife. While so, on 12.12.2012, the third respondent persuaded the petitioner and his wife to come to his house. The third respondent is none else than the father of Mallika. After that, it is alleged that the third respondent did not permit Mrs. Mallika to come and join the petitioner. With these allegations, the petitioner has come up with this Habeas Corpus Petition. 2. Today, when the Habeas Corpus Petition was taken up for hearing, the detenue appeared before this Court on her own along with the petitioner. On enquiry, she would state that it is true that for some time, the third respondent made her to stay at his home, and thereafter, the third respondent himself allowed her to leave from there and now she has joined the petitioner. She has further stated that she is happily living with the petitioner. The said statement is recorded. 3. Since there is no illegal detention, the petition deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, the Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed.