This case was finally heard and disposed of by judgment and order dated 5.12.2012. It has been brought under the heading “To Be Mentioned” for correction of some grammatical/typographical mistakes. 2. Learned counsel for all the parties including the State are present. 3. The first mistake pointed out is that the judgment is not paginated. Unfortunately, the judgment having been signed and having duly uploaded in the website of the High Court, the same cannot be now altered/corrected. The same is the problem with regard to paragraphs which cannot now be altered/corrected. I have noticed this because in view of nature of corrections sought for which are inadvertent mistakes it would have been convenient if the judgment would have been paragraphed and paginated. 4. If the judgment is paginated it would round into 34 pages and if it is paragraphed there would be 54 paragraphs to the end. For convenience of every body, the judgment being long and corrections required at various places, the corrections sought for and the corrections as being ordered are given in a tabular form with page numbers corresponding to page in the judgment and paragraph number that would correspond to paragraph if they were so done. 5. As noted above, it would be clear from the nature of corrections they are printing/ typographical error and are needed to be made in the interest of justice. All parties agree. Sl. No Page Para Line of para What is sought to be What is to be replaced on corrected correction 1 3 Cause - For Respondent Nos. 9 to 34 For Respondent Nos. 9 to 35 title 2 4 5 5th from bottom respondent nos. 9 to 39 respondent nos. All parties agree. Sl. No Page Para Line of para What is sought to be What is to be replaced on corrected correction 1 3 Cause - For Respondent Nos. 9 to 34 For Respondent Nos. 9 to 35 title 2 4 5 5th from bottom respondent nos. 9 to 39 respondent nos. 9 to 34 3 7 11 3rd from top given the Diploma given to the Diploma 4 7 12 4th from top 02.07.2006 22.07.2006 5 10 17 4th line of quotation Engineering College of is Engineering College or is 6 14 26 12th from top it was superseded it has superseded 7 19 34 1st line of the page any action the any action of the 8 19 34 12th line from top Diploma Degree 9 19 34 15th line from top holder could not even holder could not be even 10 20 35 3rd & 4th line from unless the Diploma holder unless the Diploma was academically top was graduate equivalent to graduate 11 20 36 5th line from bottom complete U-turn that was complete U-turn to what was 12 21 37 6th from top Thomson College, Roorke Thomson College, Roorke (now I.I.T. (now I.I.T, Roorke) granted Roorke) granted Diploma and even Diploma even that the for that the syllabus, course of study syllabus, course of study and duration were equivalent to 4 and duration were because years degree course and it was of this “Diploma” was added because of this “Diploma” was added while enacting the Rule. while enacting the Rules. 13 21 37 last line appointment promotion 14 32 50 3rd from top that one read Rules-4, 8 and that if one reads Rule-4, 8 and 10(c) 10(c) together which would together it would show show 15 32 50 7th from top repealed repelled 16 32 51 1st line this has accepted by this has not been accepted by 17 32 51 4th from top Rule 8 is not Part IV Rule 8 is not in Part V 18 33 51 6th from top rather than helped rather than it helped 19 33 52 4th from bottom Class-1 Service and Class-1 Service unless 20 33 52 2nd from bottom Engineers, India are to get Engineers, India to get 21 34 53 7th from top amendment and the amendment amendment until the amendment 6. Let the judgment be read with the aforesaid corrections. Let the judgment be read with the aforesaid corrections. Any party, who has taken certified copy of the judgment can apply and get a copy of this order indicating corrections, at the cost of Court, duly certified in that regard and Journal which have published the judgment may issue corrigendum in that regards.