Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2013 DIGILAW 2059 (MAD)

C. Muthusamy v. K. P. A. Palanisamy Chetty Firm Rep. By its Proprietor K. P. A. Palanisamy Salem

2013-06-18

K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU

body2013
JUDGMENT K. Ravichandrabaabu, J. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that she is not pressing this Civil Revision Petition as the other side is making payment in the execution proceedings. She has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.