Sanjay Misra, J.— Heard Sri Himanshu Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice need not be issued to the respondents in view of the order being passed herein. Learned counsel for petitioner states that Execution Case No. 05 of 2011 (Harsh Goyal Vs. State of U.P. and others) filed by the petitioner is pending before the Additional District Judge, Court No.8, Ghaziabad. A prayer has been made to issue a direction to the Additional District Judge, Court No.8, Ghaziabad to decide the said execution case expeditiously. In so far as the relief claimed by the petitioner is concerned, no such order requires to be passed by this Court since there is no material available on record to indicate the pendency position of cases before the Additional District Judge, Court No.8, Ghaziabad and as to how many older cases than of the petitioner, are pending before him. Therefore, this petition is finally disposed of by providing that the petitioner can file an expedite application before the Additional District Judge, Court No.8, Ghaziabad for expeditious disposal of his his execution case by giving cogent reasons as to why his case should be given precedence over other older cases pending before the Additional District Judge, Court No.8, Ghaziabad. In case such an expedite application is made by the petitioner, the Additional District Judge, Court No.8, Ghaziabad should take into account his roster of older cases and pass reasoned order on the expedite application of the petitioner without any further delay. No order is passed as to costs. _____________