Sanjay Misra, J.— Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice need not be issued to the respondents in view of the order being passed herein. Learned counsel for petitioner states that SCC No. 182 of 2011 (Manorma Shukla Vs Shyam Lal Shukla) filed by the petitioner is pending before the Special Judge SC/ST Act/Judge Small Cause Court, Kanpur Nagar. A prayer has been made to issue a direction to the Special Judge SC/ST Act/Judge Small Cause Court, Kanpur Nagar to decide said suit expeditiously. In so far as the relief claimed by the petitioner is concerned, no such order requires to be passed by this Court since there is no material available on record to indicate the pendency position of cases before the Special Judge SC/ST Act/Judge Small Cause Court, Kanpur Nagar and as to how many older cases than of the petitioner, are pending before him. Therefore, this petition is finally disposed of by providing that the petitioner can file an expedite application before the Special Judge SC/ST Act/Judge Small Cause Court, Kanpur Nagar, for expeditious disposal of the suit by giving cogent reasons as to why his case should be given precedence over other older cases pending before the respondent no. 4. In case such an expedite application is made by the petitioner, the Special Judge SC/ST Act/Judge Small Cause Court, Kanpur Nagar, should take into account his roster of older cases and pass reasoned order on the expedite application of the petitioner without any further delay. No order is passed as to costs. _____________