Sanjay Misra, J.— The petitioner claims to plaintiff in Case No. 275 of 1990 (Asgar Ali Vs. Smt. Durgawati Devi and others) is pending before the, respondent no.1, Judge, Small Cause Court, Varanasi. A prayer has been made to issue a direction to the respondent no. 1 to decide the said case expeditiously. In so far as the relief claimed by the petitioner is concerned, no such order requires to be passed by this Court since there is no material available on record to indicate the pendency position of cases before the respondent no. 1 and as to how many older cases than of the petitioner, are pending before him. Therefore, this petition is finally disposed of by providing that the petitioner can file an expedite application before respondent no. 1 for expeditious disposal of his case by giving cogent reasons as to why his case should be given precedence over other older cases pending before respondent no.1. In case such an expedite application is made by the petitioner, the respondent no. 1 should take into account his roster of older cases and pass reasoned order on the expedite application of the petitioner without any further delay. No order is passed as to costs. _____________