Sanjay Misra, J.— The petitioner claims to be plaintiff in Suit No.1063 of 2011 (Hari Lal Vs. State of U.P. & others) wherein application for temporary injunction 6C' is pending before Civil Judge (Sr. Division) Allahabad, Respondent No.1. A prayer has been made to issue a direction to the Respondent No. 1 to decide the said injunction application expeditiously. In so far as the relief claimed by the petitioner is concerned, no such order requires to be passed by this Court since there is no material available on record to indicate the pendency position of cases before the Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Allahabad and as to how many older cases than of the petitioner, are pending before him. Therefore, this petition is finally disposed of by providing that the petitioner can file an expedite application before the Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Allahabad for expeditious disposal of his injunction application 6-C by giving reasons of urgency and in case such an expedite application is made the Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Allahabad should apply his mind to the reasons set forth regarding urgency and pass orders thereupon forthwith. In case the Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Allahabad accepts the grounds of urgency taken in the expedite application then he should ensure that any defendant who has put in appearance in the suit should be heard also on the injunction application 6-C. However, if the trial court is of the opinion that the unserved defendants are necessarily to be heard then in that event the application of the petitioner if any for service of notice in accordance with the procedure prescribed may be considered and disposed of forthwith. The petition is disposed of. No order is passed as to costs. _______________