Fayaz Ahmad Dar v. Chief Agriculture Officer Budgam & Anr.
2013-04-16
ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY, MANSOOR AHMAD MIR
body2013
DigiLaw.ai
Mansoor, J.— 1. The instant appeal calls in question judgment dated 13th May, 2011, for short impugned judgment, passed by the learned Writ Court in OWP No. 788/2008. 2. A brief narration of the controversy, for facility of reference, may be made, thus: 3. Appellant filed a claim petition before Deputy Labour Commissioner, Srinagar, for grant of unpaid wages, delayed wages, was granted vide exparte Award and order dated 1st July, 2006. 4. Writ petitioners, Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, feeling constrained, challenged the same by the medium of writ petition viz. OWP No. 788/2006, on various grounds. 5. Appellant joined the issue, resisted the petition by filing counter. 6. Learned Writ Court, after taking note of Section 15 of Payment of Wages Act, 1936, for short Act; SRO 409 dated 2nd September, 1971, and SRO 37 dated 23rd January, 1980, held that Deputy Labour Commissioner, Srinagar, was not having the jurisdiction to entertain and determine the claim petition. 7. It is against this finding that an appeal has been preferred to seek its reversal. 8. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the matter. 9. It needs to be stated at the onset itself that there were some issues, as reflected in the writ petition and the counter, those had to be dealt with by the learned Writ Court, but have remained unattended, as the learned Writ Court has thought it proper to decide the matter on the issue of jurisdiction only. 10. It would be apt to reproduce Sub-Section (1) of Section 15 of the Act herein, thus: "15.
10. It would be apt to reproduce Sub-Section (1) of Section 15 of the Act herein, thus: "15. Claims arising out of deductions from wages or delay in payment of wages and penalty for malicious or vexatious claims.- (1) The appropriate Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint (a) any Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation; or (b) any officer of the Central Government exercising functions as, (i) Regional Labour Commissioner; or (ii) Assistant Labour Commissioner with at least two years' experience; or (c) any officer of the State Government not below the rank of Assistant Labom Commissioner with at least two years' experience; or (d) a presiding officer of any Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal, constituted under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), or under any corresponding law relating to the investigation and settlement of industrial disputes in force in the State; or e) any other officer with experience as a Judge of a Civil Court or a Judicial Magistrate, as the authority to hear and decide for any specified area all claims arising out of deductions from the wages, or delay in payment of the wages, of persons employed or paid in that area, including all matters incidental to such claims: Provided that where the appropriate Government considers it necessary so to do, it may appoint more than one authority for any specified area and may, by general or special order, provide for the distribution or allocation of work to be performed by them under this Act.))" 11. In terms of mandate of said Section, it is the Authority appointed/specified by the Govt. to entertain the application within their respective jurisdictions. It would be apt to reproduce SRO 409 dated 2nd September, 1971, herein, thus: "SRO-409.- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 20 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (Central Act No. 8 of 1923) and in supersession of all the previous notifications on the subject, the State Government hereby appoint the Assistant Labour Commissioners to be Commissioners for Workmen's Compensation under the said Act within the areas of their respective jurisdiction." 12.
The reproduced text makes it explicit that all the notifications issued on the subject earlier have been superseded and that Commissioners appointed vide SRO 409 under Workmen Compensation Act shall be the Authority for the purposes of Sub-Section (1) of Section 15 of the Act, for Kashmir province and Jammu province. SRO 37 dated 23rd January, 1980, supersedes SRO 421 dated 2nd September, 1971, and it provides that all the Commissioners appointed under SRO 409 dated 2nd September, 1971, to be the Authorities for the purposes of said sub-section within their respective territorial jurisdiction. Let us have a look at SRO 37 dated 23rd January, 1980, also, thus: "SRO-37.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, (IV of 1936) and in supersession of notification SRO-421 dated 2nd September, 1971, the Government of Jammu and Kashmir hereby appoint the Commissioners for Workmen's Compensation, appointed under notification SRO-409 dated 2nd September, 1971, to be authorities for the purposes of the said sub-section within their respective territorial jurisdiction." 13. Learned Writ Court after noticing SRO 409 dated 2nd September, 1971, read with SRO 37 supra held that appellant/claimant had to file claim petition before the Authority who had jurisdiction within the district Budgam and the Authority at Srinagar had no jurisdiction to deal with the matter. 14. Learned counsel for the parties had not brought to the notice of the learned Writ Court SRO 457 dated 26th September, 1975, which was issued after SRO 409 dated 2nd September, 1971. It would be apt to reproduce SRO 457 dated 26th September, 1975, herein, thus: "SRO-457.-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (IV of 1936) the Government of Jammu and Kashmir hereby appoint the Deputy Labour Commissioners Jammu and Srinagar (Commissioners for Workmen's Compensation) to be the authority for purposes of the said sub-section for the divisions of Jammu and Kashmir." 15. In terms of the said Notification Deputy Labour Commissioners Jammu and Srinagar are appointed as Commissioners for Workmen's Compensation to be the authority for purposes of the sub-section 1 of Section 15 of the Act, for the divisions of Jammu and Kashmir. 16.
In terms of the said Notification Deputy Labour Commissioners Jammu and Srinagar are appointed as Commissioners for Workmen's Compensation to be the authority for purposes of the sub-section 1 of Section 15 of the Act, for the divisions of Jammu and Kashmir. 16. Thus the Deputy Labour Commissioners' Jammu and Kashmir have the jurisdiction to deal with the claim petitions which had arisen within their respective divisions and this SRO is not superseded by SRO 37 supra. 17. In this view of the matter, one comes to inescapable conclusion that the claimant has a choice to either file a claim petition in a district where the cause of action has arisen or before the Deputy Labour Commissioners Jammu or Kashmir within whose jurisdiction the matter falls. 18. Having regard to the above narration, while allowing the appeal, we set aside the impugned judgment. 19. Writ petition is remanded to learned Writ Court with the request that it be decided as early as possible. 20. Send down the record.