Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2013 DIGILAW 2190 (ALL)

Vimaljit & 2 Others v. State of U. P. & 3 Others

2013-08-30

HET SINGH YADAV, SURENDRA SINGH

body2013
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Vimaljit, Kanchan Yadav and Dargahii Lal for quashing of FIR of Case Crime No. 230 of 2013 under Sections 363 and 366 I.P.C., Police Station Shivraj, District Kanpur Nagar. 3. The petitioner no. 2, Kanchan Yadav, the wife and petitioner no. 1, Vimaljit, the husband are present in this Court and they have been identified by their lawyer. The wife-petitioner claims to have voluntarily married the husband-petitioner out of her own sweet will and is living with him without any coercion and compulsion, and denies that she has ever been kidnapped by the husband-petitioner or the other petitioners. 4. It is mentioned that the wife-petitioner is major and there is no dispute between the parties regarding her age. 5. Since the wife-petitioner as per High School certificate is major, we direct her to appear before the I.O concerned, who shall record her statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C and shall produce her before the CJM/Magistrate concerned for getting her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C, who shall duly record the same. 6. The I.O shall provided proper security to the wife-petitioner for ensuring compliance of the aforesaid directions. 7. In case the said statements are favorable to the accused- petitioners and others, the I.O. shall consider the appropriateness of submitting a final report in this case and the CJM concerned may also pass appropriate orders in this regard. 8. For the future security of the wife-petitioner, the husband-petitioner is directed to deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lac only) in a nationalized bank/post office in the form of fixed deposit for a period of not less than three years within one month in the exclusive name of the wife-petitioner. 9. The amount so deposited shall not be withdrawn before its maturity under any circumstances except with the leave of the CJM/Magistrate concerned. 10. The concerned bank/post office shall be instructed by the depositor (the husband-petitioner) to make a specific note in the record as well as on the fixed deposit receipt that the same shall not be encashed before maturity except with the leave of the CJM/Magistrate concerned. 11. 10. The concerned bank/post office shall be instructed by the depositor (the husband-petitioner) to make a specific note in the record as well as on the fixed deposit receipt that the same shall not be encashed before maturity except with the leave of the CJM/Magistrate concerned. 11. The husband-petitioner is directed to furnish proof before the CJM/Magistrate concerned within a month that he has made out the fixed deposit receipt as directed above in the name of the wife-petitioner. 12. Till the disposal of the aforesaid proceedings before the CJM concerned as provided herein above, the arrest of the petitioners in the aforesaid case, shall remain stayed. 13. In case the husband-petitioner fails to fulfill any of the conditions mentioned herein above, the stay of arrest granted by this Court shall stand vacated. 14. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. _____________