JUDGMENT M. Jaichandren, J. 1. M.P.No.1 of 2012 has been filed praying to condone the delay of 862 days in filing the above Original Side Appeal, against the order, dated 24.1.2008, made in A.No.42 of 2008, in A.No.3765 of 2001, in C.S.No.331 of 1996. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the 2nd respondent had played fraud on the Court, during the hearing of the Application, in A.No.42 of 2008. 3. He had further stated that the petitioner had obtained information, with regard to the proceedings in A.No.42 of 2008, by filing a petition under the Right to Information Act, 2005. However, it is noted that the order, in Application No.42 of 2008, had been passed on 24.1.2008, whereas, the petitioner had filed the petition, seeking information under the Right to Information Act, 2005, only on 30.6.2011. There is no explanation offered by the petitioner for the long delay in filing the petition seeking information relating to the proceedings, in Application No.42 of 2008, by invoking the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Even the other averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the petition have not been substantiated with sufficient evidence. 4. As such, we do not find it appropriate to condone the delay of 862 days in filing the above Original Side Appeal. Accordingly, M.P.No.1 of 2012, stands dismissed. Consequently, O.S.A. SR.No.63326 of 2011, stands rejected. No costs.