JUDGMENT 1. - This IInd bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.Brief facts of the case are as under: "The complainant Bhagwati Singh submitted a written report before the Police Station Raising Nagar District Ganganagar bearing F.I.R. No. 266/2012 for offence under Sections 489B, 489A, 120B, 489C, 489D I.P.C. The allegation against the accused petitioner is that fake currency of Rs. 46,000/- was kept by him and circulated and laptop and printer for Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 preparing the said currency were recovered from the accused petitioner and other co-accused persons. After investigation police filed challan before the competent Court at Jaipur and the above case was transferred to the Court of Special Court, (Fake Currency Case) Jaipur City Jaipur and the said case was registered as Sessions Case No. 31/2012. The accused petitioner was arrested and he behind the bar from 9.7.2012. The petitioner submitted bail application bearing No. 6669/2012 before the Principal Seat of the High Court at Jodhpur under Section 439 Cr.P.C. and the same was dismissed on 12.12.2012. The accused petitioner filed second bail application before the Trial Court and the said application was dismissed on 15.5.2013. Thereafter the petitioner filed a fresh bail application bearing No. 5516 of 2013 before this Court and the same was dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner filed the second bail application before this Court on the ground that the co-accused has been granted bail by the Apex Court." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the co-accused Harpreet Singh @ Pitra has been granted bail by the Apex Court vide order dated 19.11.2013. In these circumstances it was prayed that the accused petitioner may also be released on bail as the trial of the case will take time. 3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the same. He has contended that the police had arrested the accused petitioner with fake currency, laptop and printer. In these circumstances it was prayed that the accused petitioner should not be released on bail. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the entire facts and material on record. Earlier the petitioner filed Bail Application No. 6669/2012 before the Principal Seat at Jodhpur and the same w as rejected on 12.12.2012. The case related to fake currency and hence it was transferred to Special Court (Fake Currency Cases) Jaipur. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the entire facts and material on record. Earlier the petitioner filed Bail Application No. 6669/2012 before the Principal Seat at Jodhpur and the same w as rejected on 12.12.2012. The case related to fake currency and hence it was transferred to Special Court (Fake Currency Cases) Jaipur. Thereafter the petitioner filed second bail application before the Trial Court. The Trial Court while rejecting his bail application observed as under: " gLrxr izdj.k esa vfHk;qDr fodzethr mQZ fodzkUr ds fo:) fnukad 18-2-2013 dks Hkk0n0la0 dh /kkjk 489 ch] 489,@489lh o 489 Mh ds vkjksi yxk;s x;s rFkk vfHk;kstu dh vksj ls vkjksi fojfpr fd;s tkus ds mijkar xokg ih0MCY;w0 1 enuyky] ih0 MCY;w0 2 lqjsUnz mQZ fuVw] ih0 MCY;w0 3 /keZiky] ih0 MCY;w0 4 egkohj izlkn ih0 MCY;w0 5 jkedqekj] ih0MCY;w0 6 lrh'kdqekj dks ijhf{kr djk;k x;k gSA xokg ih0 MCY;w0 4 egkohj izlkn o xokg ih0 MCY;w0 5 jkedqekj QnZ tIrh ysiVki rFkk QnZ tIrh dwVjfpr eqnzk o uD'kk ekSdk cjkenxh LFky dwVjfpr eqnzk ds xokg gS] ijh{k.k ds nksjku fo'ks"k yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk i{knzksgh ?kksf"kr fd;s x;sA ysfdu gLrxr izdj.k esa vHkh vU; vfHk;kstu lk{kh ftuesa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh o vU; iqfyldehZ o vU; xokg 'kkfey gS] fd lk{; gksuk 'ks"k gSA vfHk;qDr ij ऱ 46 gtkj ds dwVd`r eqnzk dks j[kus rFkk pykus o ysiVkWi o fizUVj ds lkFk o vU; eqyfteku ds lkFk feydj dwVd`r eqnzk rS;kj djus o dwVd`r eqnzk rS;kj djus gsrq ysiVkWi o fizUVj j[kus ds xaHkhj vkjksi gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vfHk;kstu }kjk tks lk{; izLrqr dh x;h gS ml ij esfjV ij foospu fd;s cxSj vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksfir vkjksiksa dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, o izdj.k ds leLr rF; o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, ;g U;k;ky; vfHk;qDr }kjk izLrqr f}rh; tekur izkFkZuki= dks Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;kfpr ugh le>rk rFkk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA " 5. In view of above, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I do not think it proper to accept the IInd bail application of the petitioner at this stage as there is no new ground and material change in the circumstances of the case and looking to the fact that the faked currency and apparatus relating to preparing faked currency recovered from the accused petitioner and the trial is going to be completed soon as statements of some of the witnesses Rave been recorded and the same is hereby dismissed. However, the Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial, pending before it, as early as possible.Bail application dismissed. *******