JUDGMENT 1. This civil revision petition is filed as against the order in E.A.No.8 of 2013 in E.P.No.210 of 2011 dated 09.04.2013 wherein and whereby the prayer sought for by the petitioner herein to pay the decretal amount in equal monthly instalments at the rate of Rs.50,000/- per month was rejected. 2. Though the application is filed by raising several contentions, the court below has rejected the same on the main reason that the petitioner had already approached the court below with a similar application in E.A.No.204 of 2012 and the same was dismissed by the court on 27.08.2012. Considering the said fact, the court below has rejected the present application by saying that the same is not maintainable without challenging the earlier order passed in E.A.No.204 of 2012. 3. I find no infirmity or irregularity in the order passed by the court below when it is factually admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the similar application filed by the petitioner was earlier dismissed by the court below and the petitioner has not taken any steps to challenge the same so far. The petitioner cannot agitate and contest the matter with a similar prayer consecutively even though the earlier application filed came to be dismissed on merits. Therefore, the court below is right in dismissing the application on the ground that the petitioner had not challenged the earlier order passed. Accordingly, I find no merits in the civil revision petition and the same is dismissed. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.