JUDGMENT 1. - This petition under Section 482 has been filed against the order 30.10.2013 passed by Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nadbai Distt. Bharatpur in Cr. Case No. 283/2011 whereby the court below has dismissed his application for cross-examination. 2. The short facts of the case are that petitioner is facing trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short NI Act) before the court below. During the trial of the case, application under Section 311 Cr.P.C has been filed that complainant be called for further cross-examination as some important questions regarding documents could not be put to him which was rejected by the court below hence this petition. 3. The contention of the petitioner is that agreement and compromise deed has been entered between the parties and for the same, no question could be asked to the complainant, hence in the interest of justice, he could be recalled. Per contra, the learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the impugned application as well as the order impugned. 5. A bare reading of the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C speaks that in a casual manner, the application has been filed, nothing has been stated that on which documents, the present petitioner wants to cross-examine the complainant and why earlier cross-examination could not be done on the same even no reference of any documents have been made in the application. It is not in dispute that earlier complainant has been examined by counsel for the petitioner and court below was right in observing that when earlier complainant has been examined by the advocate due to change of advocate only, is not a ground to recall the complainant and nothing has been stated in the application that on what points, present petitioner wants to cross-examine the complainant. 6. There is no perversity in the order. Earlier complainant has been examined, hence there is no occasion to recall him without any legal basis. 7. In view of the above, this petition is liable to be rejected and hence dismissed. *******