JUDGMENT S. Nagamuthu, J. 1. One Kantharani, aged 27 years, is the daughter of the fourth respondent. The fourth respondent and the petitioner are close relatives. The petitioner claims that he had fallen in love with Kantharani and also likes to marry her. Now, according to the petitioner, much against the wish of Kantharani, she is illegally detained by the fourth respondent, who is her father. In this regard, he has made a complaint to the police on 17.12.2012. Since, no action was taken on the same,the petitioner has come up with this petition. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and also the learned counsel for the fourth respondent. The learned counsel for the fourth respondent would submit that the girl has been in the legal custody and care of the fourth respondent and there is no illegal detention. 3. In our considered opinion, the petitioner has no locus standi to maintain the Habeas Corpus Petition at all. After all Kantharani is living with her father. In our considered view, this Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed with ulterior motives. Therefore, this Habeas Corpus Petition deserves to be dismissed. Accordingly, it is dismissed.