JUDGMENT : Heard the matter finally. 2. The applicant/State has moved this revision application against the order dated 20.1.1999 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Panna in ST No.110/1998 whereby the respondent was discharged from the charge of offence punishable under Section 306 of I.P.C. The prosecution's story in short is that deceased Ram Bai, daughter-in-law of the respondent, committed suicide on 17.11.1998. 3. It was alleged against the respondent that she was continuously abusing the deceased. The deceased was having no problem with the husband and father-in-law but due to abuses of the respondent she committed suicide. After due investigation a charge sheet was prepared and the case was committed to the Court of Sessions. 4. After considering the submissions made by learned Panel Lawyer and on perusal of the impugned order it appears that learned Sessions Judge has discussed in detail about the overt acts of the respondent and it was found that those overt acts do not fall within the purview of Section 107 of I.P.C and therefore, no offence punishable under Section 306 of I.P.C is made out against the respondent. In the entire investigation no overt act of the respondent is shown which falls under Section 107 of I.P.C. It was not a case in which the respondent kept the deceased in such a situation that she had no option except to commit suicide. Under such circumstances, the learned Sessions Judge has rightly discharged the respondent from the charge of offence punishable under section 306 of I.P.C. There is no basis by which any interference can be done in the impugned order. 5. Under such circumstances, the revision filed by the State cannot be accepted and consequently, it is hereby dismissed.