Ramesh Sinha, J.;— Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the applicant which is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Manish Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that though the F.I.R. was earlier registered under Section 394, 411 I.P.C. Thereafter the charges were altered under Section 395 and 412 I.P.C. The same error has occurred in the bail rejection order dated 12.7.2013 passed by Special Judge (D.A.A. Act) Agra. Thereafter the applicant moved a correction application before the court concerned which was allowed by the Special Judge (D.A.A. Act,) Agra vide order dated 10.9.2013 and has amended Section 395 and 412 I.P.C., a certified copy of the same has been annexed as annexure-1 to the supplementary affidavit filed today. He further submits that co-accused Kishan @ Kishna and Himanshu Gupta @ Anshul have been granted bail by this Court vide orders dated 29.7.2013 and 30.8.2013 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 21903 of 2013 and 24432 of 2013 respectively and the case of the applicant stands on identical footing, hence the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. The applicant is in jail since 2.6.2013. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Bail orders of aforesaid co-accused have been produced by the learned counsel for the applicant. The same is taken on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Let the applicant Sheru involved in Case Crime No. 297 of 2013 under Sections 395, 412 IPC Police Station Shahganj, District Agra be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant will appear before the trial Court on the date fixed. 8. It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 10. Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to make necessary correction in the present application. _____________