JUDGMENT : Heard on admission. The applicant has preferred this revision against the order dated 6.2.1999 passed by JMFC, Harda in Criminal Case No.293 of 1995 whereby the respondents no.2, 3 and 4 were acquitted from the charges of offence punishable under section 447, 294 and 506 Part II of I.P.C. The prosecution's case in short is that, on the report lodged by the complainant/the applicant, a trial was initiated against the respondents no.2 to 4 for the aforesaid offences. After giving several opportunities the complainant as well as the other witnesses did not appear before the trial Court and therefore, in the light of the judgment dated 8.10.1988 passed by Hon'ble the Apex Court in the case of “Rajdev Sharma Vs. State of Bihar” AIR 1999 SC 3524 the trial Court closed the evidence of the prosecution and acquitted the respondents no.2 to 4. At present the complainant could now show any reason as to why he and his witnesses did not appear before the trial Court though several summons and warrants were issued against them. Under such circumstances, where the case was a summons trial there was no option to the trial Court except to close the evidence and pronounce the judgment. Since there was no evidence therefore, the trial Court could not convict the respondents no.2 to 4. No illegality or perversity is visible in the order passed by the trial Court and therefore, no revision can be accepted against the impugned order. Consequently, the present revision is hereby dismissed at motion stage. Copy of the order be sent to the trial Court along with its record for information.