Judgment :- S. NAGAMUTHU, J. 1. The petitioner is the father of one Ananth, aged 33 years. Mr.Ananth was married to one Jeevalakshmi on 30.11.2012. On 1.12.2012, the bridegroom and the bride has gone to the house of the parents of the bride but the bridegroom, namely, Ananth did not reach the house of his father in law and from that onwards he is found missing. In this regard, the petitioner has given a complaint. The grievance of the petitioner is that no action has been taken on the same. 2. When the matter was taken up, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on the complaint of the petitioner, the second respondent has registered a case in Crime No.248 of 2012 for “man missing” and investigation is taken in the right direction and steps are being taken to trace out the missing man. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above, no further orders are necessary in this Habeas Corpus Petition. The Habeas Corpus Petition is closed except making it clear that the second respondent shall continue to investigate the matter and trace out the missing man, expeditiously.