JUDGMENT : By filing I.A.No.812/2013, the said intervener has stated that he is elected as director of the society and he be heard. 2. With the consent of parties, the intervener is also heard. 3. The short prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application under Section 80-A of the M.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (in short the Act) is filed before respondent No.2-Registrar (Annexure P/1) which is pending consideration before the said authority and the said authority be directed to deal with it in accordance with law. Shri Khot submits that the said application was preferred by three modes i.e. fax, registered post and through e-mail. He submits that he will be satisfied if the said authority is directed to deal with this application in accordance with law. Shri Khot also relied on an order of this Court in W.P.No.296/2013 dated 15.1.2013 (Kaptan Singh Vs. State of M.P. & Ors.). 4. Shri Praveen Newaskar, learned Deputy Govt. Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3/State, has no objection to this innocuous prayer. 5. Shri Vivek Jain, learned counsel for the intervener, submits that proper remedy for the petitioner when elections are over and elected candidates resumed is to file a dispute under Section 64 of the Act and the extraordinary remedy under Section 80-A of the Act cannot be invoked. 6. However, in the opinion of this Court, this petition can be disposed of without expressing any opinion on the maintainability of the application (Annexure P/1) and merits of the matter with following directions:- 1. The respondent No.2 shall deal with the said application in accordance with law expeditiously. 2. It will be open for the intervener to seek an opportunity of hearing before respondent No.2 before Annexure P/1 is decided. If such prayer is made, the said respondent will deal with it in accordance with law. It be noted that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the tenability of the said application and merits of the matter. The petition stands disposed of.