JUDGMENT : Heard on admission. 2. The applicant has preferred the revision against the judgment dated 22.9.2012 passed by the learned VIIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Rewa in Criminal Appeal No.43/2012 whereby the appeal of the applicant was dismissed being not maintainable. 3. Facts of the case in short are that, a prosecution was initiated against the respondents no.1 to 5 before the trial Court i.e JMFC, Rewa in Criminal Case No.696/2006 for offence punishable under Section 498-A of I.P.C and the trial Court vide judgment dated 27.12.2011 acquitted the respondents no.1 to 5 and thereafter, the applicant preferred an appeal under Section 372 of Cr.P.C before the Sessions Court which was transferred to VIIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Rewa. Learned VIIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Rewa has held that the appeal was not maintainable under section 372 of Cr.P.C because the incident took place on 29.9.2004 and therefore, in the light of judgment passed by Hon'ble the Apex Court in the case of “Rashtriya Mahila Aayog Vs. State of Delhi”{(2011) 2 CCSC 825] amended provisions of Section 372 of Cr.P.C does not have retrospective effect and therefore, the appeal filed under Section 372 of Cr.P.C was not maintainable. 4. The reason mentioned by the VIIIth Additional Sessions Judge appears to be correct and there is no reason by which the findings given by the appellate Court can be disturbed. It was for the applicant to withdraw the appeal from the Sessions Court and to file that appeal before the High Court and she lost that opportunity. The learned counsel for the applicant before the appellate Court did not examine the position and therefore, at present nothing can be done in the present revision. No illegality or perversity is visible in the impugned judgment passed by the learned VIIIth Additional Sessions Judge, Rewa. No interference can be done in the revision filed by the applicant. 5. Consequently the revision filed by the applicant is hereby dismissed at motion stage.