Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2013 DIGILAW 2726 (MAD)

S. SURESH VERMA v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

2013-07-29

M.JAICHANDREN

body2013
ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the respondent with regard to the reliefs prayed for in the writ petition and if the respondent is directed to dispose of the same, on merits, within a specified time. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to the respondent with regard to the reliefs prayed for in the writ petition, within a period of two weeks from today, and on such representation being submitted, the respondent shall pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks thereafter. 5. With the above directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.