Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2013 DIGILAW 2801 (MAD)

E. Elumalai v. Commissioner & Secretary To Government of Tamilnadu Land Acquisition, Chennai

2013-08-01

M.JAICHANDREN

body2013
Judgment : 1. The learned counsels take notice for the respondents. 2. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 12.9.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents have no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 12.9.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 12.9.2011, to the second respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.