V.K. Shukla & Suneet Kumar,JJ. Petitioner Maan Singh is before this Court with the prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to infringe human rights of petitioner and petitioner should not be dispossessed from the Show Room situated at Sector 39, Noida, District Gautam Budh Nagar. 2. Record in question reflects that inter-se petitioner and Daya Nand Sharma there has been an agreement which was initially for the period of five years and petitioner has submitted that thereafter by oral agreement the life span of said agreement has been extended. This much has also been reflected that Daya Nand Sharma is not more interested in retaining the petitioner and in the said direction steps have been undertaken and it appears that petitioner has proceeded to file Suit No. 1024 of 2013 on 03.09.2013 and the said suit is pending. Similarly, Daya Nand Sharma has also terminated the lease in question and filed S.S.C. Suit No. 30 of 2013 before the District Judge, Gautam Budh Nagar on the ground that rent has been enhanced w.e.f. 28th August, 2008 and same has not all been paid, and accordingly the teancy has been terminated on 23.09.2013.The said suit has also been entertained. Thus, this much is accepted that two suits inter-se parties are pending. 3. Petitioner is contending that on one hand Civil Suit in question are pending and on the other hand in collusion with Civil Administration without awaiting for the out come of the suit in question pressure is being exerted to vacate the premises and he has represented the matter before Human Rights Commission. Once petitioner has filed suit, he can bring all these facts to the knowledge and notice of the court concerned, who would proceed to consider the request of petitioner on merits. 4. Once there is law and order problem, petitioner can always take recourse of forum as is provided under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1973 against the incumbents trying to take law in their hands fair and fall, but the prayer in the manner as it has been made cannot be accorded by this Court. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. _______________