JUDGMENT :- Heard Mr. Santosh Adukia, learned advocate for the applicant. The learned Advocate for the respondent is absent. 2. Admitted. Heard finally. 3. The applicants are accused nos. 4 and 6 in Criminal Complaint No.160/ 2011 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court Room No.10, Nagpur. The applicants have applied for transfer of the said Criminal Complaint case from Nagpur to the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate at Mumbai. The alleged offence had taken place within the territorial jurisdiction of Nagpur Court. During the course of hearing, it was indicated to the learned counsel for the applicants that this Court is not inclined to grant relief as prayed by the applicants. However, it was also indicated that considering the peculiar facts of the case and the alleged conduct of the respondent/complainant, the Court is inclined to grant exemption from personal appearance to the accused except one of the accused who will attend the case on the dates of hearing. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that he will be satisfied with the alternate relief suggested to be granted by this Court. Hence I pass the following order:- ORDER The prayer for transfer of Criminal Complaint is rejected. However, it is directed that one of the accused from amongst accused nos.2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 shall remain present on all the dates of hearing before the Magistrate. The accused who do not appear shall be exempted from personal appearance on application being made by their Advocate on the date fixed for appearance. It is further directed that the learned Magistrate may ask for appearance of all the accused as and when their personal attendance is necessary before the Court during the course of trial. The learned Magistrate shall hear the case expeditiously and try to decide the same as fast as possible taking into consideration the workload of the Court. Application stands disposed off accordingly. Ordered accordingly.