Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2013 DIGILAW 3398 (MAD)

N. Saravanan v. R. Anuja

2013-09-19

C.S.KARNAN

body2013
Judgment : 1. The revision petitioner has preferred the above two revision petitions i.e., C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.1215 of 2013 to direct the Family Court, Madurai, to dispose H.M.O.P.Nos.695 of 2012, filed by him against his wife, who is the respondent therein for the dissolution of marriage solemnized between them and another C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.1216 of 2013 with a similar prayer to direct the Family Court, Madurai, to dispose H.M.O.P.No.84 of 2013 at the earliest, which has been filed by his wife, against him, for conjugal rights. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the marriage was solemnized on 07.03.2011 and immediately after marriage, they started their wedded life at Madurai. The respondent Wife categorically declared that she had many boy friends and that she disliked the petitioner and further, she ill-treated the petitioner by causing mental agony. Therefore, the petitioner is constrained to file the divorce petition on the ground of cruelty. Further, the petitioner is extending his co-operation for a speedy disposal of the above mentioned two cases, which are pending on the file of the Family Court, Madurai. 3. The very competent counsel for the respondent has submitted that the respondent wife married the revision petitioner on 07.03.2011 as per Hindu customs and rites. Before marriage, the petitioner disclosed that he is a Graduate, but actually he has not completed his graduation. After the marriage, both led their married life with reciprocal love and affection in a happy atmosphere and she conceived a baby. On the instigation of the petitioner's side, the petitioner deserted the respondent and hence the respondent wife filed the H.M.O.P.No.84 of 2013 for conjugal rights. The respondent also is expecting a speedy trial in the above two cases. 4. On verifying the factual position of the case and arguments advanced by the learned counsel on either side and on perusing the typed set of papers, this Court directs the Family Court, Madurai, to dispose the above two cases i.e., H.M.O.P.Nos.695 of 2012 and 84 of 2013, on merits, within a period of six months, from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order and after giving sufficient opportunities to the parties for filing counter statement if any. 5. Accordingly, the above revision petitions are disposed of. No costs.