Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2013 DIGILAW 345 (MAD)

A. Seenipandian Represented by his Power of Attorney M. Gurusamy v. Inspector General of Registration

2013-01-11

K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU

body2013
ORDER : 1. When the matter was listed on 09.01.2013, there was no representation for the petitioner in both the writ petitions. Hence, the matter is listed to-day under the caption 'For Dismissal'. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are dismissed for default. No costs.