ORDER S. Abdul Nazeer, J.—Petitioner Nos. 2 to 81 were admitted to the first petitioner-College for the study of B.Ed., course for the academic session 2011-2012. The University did not permit the said students to appear for the first semester B.Ed., examination in the month of June, 2012. Therefore, they have filed these writ petitions seeking a direction to the respondent-University to permit the students to appear for the said examination. This Court has passed an interim order permitting the students to appear for the said examination. Accordingly, they have appeared for the examination. This Court has also permitted the students to appear for the second semester B.Ed., examination. 2. The contention of the respondent-University is that the college has not submitted the admission list of the students and admission fee along with the documents of those students to the University within time. That is why the University has not permitted the students to appear for the examination. 3. Learned Counsel appealing for the petitioners submits that the first petitioner-college had in fact submitted the documents of the students to the respondent-University. Since the said documents were not in conformity with the relevant Regulations, they were returned by the University. Thereafter, the college has re-submitted the documents, which has caused the delay. 4. It is to be noted here that the admissions of the students to the B.Ed course is regulated by the Regulations of the respondent-University, in terms of the said Regulations, the University has issued the notification fixing the date of admission, date of submission of the admission list along with the prescribed fee, etc. The colleges are bound to submit the documents, admission list and other particulars within the prescribed time. In the instant case, it is evident that the college has not submitted the relevant documents in terms of the notification of the University. 5. At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that henceforth the college will submit the statement of admissions along with the admission fee and other documents in terms of the relevant notification of the University within the prescribed period. The said submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioners is placed on record. 6. 5. At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that henceforth the college will submit the statement of admissions along with the admission fee and other documents in terms of the relevant notification of the University within the prescribed period. The said submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioners is placed on record. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the lapse on the part of the college in not submitting the statement of admissions and other particulars of the students requires to be condoned in the interest of the career of the students subject to payment of penalty of Rs. 500/- per student. It is made clear that the said sum shall not be collected by the college from the students on any pretext. The penalty as above shall be paid within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On payment of penalty as above, the University is directed to consider the admission of the students to the course in question in accordance with law. If they are found to be eligible for admission, the respondent-University is directed to declare the result of the examination taken by the students pursuant to the interim order of this Court and allow the eligible students to complete their course in accordance with law. Writ petitions are disposed of accordingly. No costs.