N. Mrinalini Reddy v. Sridhar Regional Transport Authority Chennai
2013-11-13
M.JAICHANDREN
body2013
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT 1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. This Contempt Petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to punish the respondent for having disobeyed the order passed by this Court, on 29.4.2011, in W.P.No.11835 of 2011. 3. At this stage of the hearing of the Contempt Petition, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent has placed before this Court a copy of the proceedings of the respondent, dated 11.11.2013. The said proceedings had been issued by the respondent, in compliance of the order passed by this Court, on 29.4.2011, in W.P.No.11835 of 2011. In such circumstances, as no further orders are necessary, the Contempt Petition stands closed. No costs.