JUDGMENT N.K. JAIN, J. 1. Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners have preferred this Crl. Misc. Case under Section 482 Cr. P.C. for quashment of FIR No. 25(7) 2012 dated 22.07.2012 registered at Police Station, Singtam, East Sikkim as well as the charge-sheet and S.T. Case No. 28 of 2012 pending before the learned Sessions Judge, East and North Sikkim at Gangtok under Sections 448, 307 and 326 IPC. 3. The only submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the parties have entered into a compromise in the matter, therefore, proceedings pending before the Sessions Court be quashed. 4. Per contra, Mr. J.B. Pradhan, learned Public Prosecutor submitted that offence under Sections 307 and 326 IPC both are non-compoundable. Therefore, on the basis of compromise between the parties, the proceedings pending before the trial Court cannot be quashed. 5. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw this Crl. Misc. Case, with liberty to argue the matter before the trial Court, where the case is fixed for framing of charges against the accused. The said prayer is not opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor also. 6. After considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, I think it fit and proper to grant permission to learned counsel for the petitioners to withdraw this Crl. Misc. Case and also to grant liberty as prayed for. Consequently, the Crl. Misc. Case is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for.