JUDGMENT 1. - By this revision petition, a challenge is made to the order dated 06.12.2012 limited to framing of charges under Section 307 IPC. 2. It is stated that allegation against petitioners is for causing injury by sword, whereas injury report does not show injuries by sharp edged weapon. It was reported to be dangerous to life, but are shown to be grievous by blunt weapon. In view of the above, a case under Section 307 IPC is not made out. It is moreso when fight took at the place of petitioners and cross FIR has been registered even against complainant party herein, accordingly, charge for offence under Section 307 IPC may be dropped and petitioners be discharged from the aforesaid charge. 3. Public Prosecutor opposed the petition and submits that injuries have been received by blunt weapon and found to be grievous, thus, charges under section 307 IPC against Akil Khan and Sakil have rightly been framed and for remaining under section 307/34 of IPC. 4. I have considered the submission and find that allegation against Sutta and Akil Khan is for causing injuries by sharp edged weapon. However, injury report shows it to be by blunt object and are not opined to be dangerous to life, but found to be grievous in nature. 5. Looking to the aforesaid, apart from the facts and circumstances of cross FIR and the place of incidence, offence under section 307 IPC is not made out. A reference of the judgment of this Court in the case of Ramlal v. State of Rajasthan, reported in 2004 WLC (Raj.) UC 355 has been taken note of. Petitioners, Akil Khan and Sakil are accordingly discharged from the charges under section 307 IPC and remaining accused-petitioners from 307/34 of IPC. Accordingly, the order impugned is modified to that extent and revision petition is partly allowed. This disposes of stay application also.Revision partly allowed. *******