Judgment 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to get set aside the order dated 29.11.2012, passed in I.A.No.79 of 2012 in I.D.No.43 of 2005, by the Labour Court, Tirunelveli. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner. 3. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner would echo the cri de coeur and heart burns of his client - the General Manager, State Express Transport Corporation, to the effect that I.D.No.43 of 2005 pending in the Labour Court, Tirunelveli, has become infructuous for various reasons as set out by him in his separate I.A.No.79 of 2012, but the Labour Court in its impugned order simply rejected the prayer of the revision petitioner for dropping the proceedings. 4. A mere running of the eye over the order of the Labour Court would clearly demonstrate and display that the Labour Court, strictly in accordance with the objectives of the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act and the Industrial Jurisprudence, correctly observed that the Labour Court is enjoined to proceed with the I.D. and render its verdict in accordance with law and in the middle itself, it cannot simply hold that the I.D. has become infructuous etc., Over and above that, as against such dismissal of the I.A., no Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is maintainable. If that Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is entertained, those provisions of the Labour Court would be set at naught. 5. With these observations, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs.