Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2013 DIGILAW 520 (CAL)

KALYAN KUMAR GHOSH v. STATE

2013-07-30

DEBASISH KAR GUPTA

body2013
JUDGMENT 1. Let the affidavit of service be kept on record. 2. This writ application is directed against an order passed by the respondent no.3 under his memo no. 146/(5)/Law dated May 20, 2013. By virtue of the impugned order, the claim of the petitioner for extending the benefit of post graduate scale of pay was rejected by the respondent no.3 in connection with his services as an assistant teacher of Kidderpore Academy, Kolkata in Science Group. The petitioner obtained M.Sc. degree in mathematics. 3. The last date of M.Sc. Part-II Examination being May 26, 2005. The certificate of above M.Sc. degree in mathematics was issued on December 24, 2005 (at page 40 of the writ application). For examining the decision making process of the respondent no.3 in rejecting the claim of the petitioner, the operative part of the impugned order is quoted below :- “It is pertinent to mention that the petitioner passed his final M.Sc. examination in the year 2006, i.e. after the publication of the West Bengal Schools (Control of Expenditure)Act, 2005 so, his case would be rightly considered under the purview of the rules under the said Act. In an another judgment in MAT 568 of 2007, the Hon’ble Division Bench, Calcutta High Court was pleased to opine that The provision in Section 16 would not be applicable to aid the claim of the petitioner as by virtue of section 20 of the 2005 Act the circulars and orders existing previously stand abrogated. That being the position of law, the petitioner would not be entitled to claim higher scale of pay. Hence, in the light of the aforesaid provision of existing Rule & Govt. Order, all the above observations made by the Hon’ble High Court and having regard to the fact and circumstances of the case, the materials on record vis-a-vis the law applicable thereto, the prayer of the petitioner does not contemplate a correct proposition of law. Accordingly, I hold that the petitioner is not entitled to get any relief as he prayed for. Thus, the matter is disposed of. All concerned be informed accordingly. Sd/ District Inspector of Schools(SE) Kolkata. Dated, Kolkata 20.05.2013” 4. After considering the certificate issued to the petitioner for obtaining M.Sc. degree in mathematics, I find that there is an error in finding a fact on the part of the respondent no.3. The petitioner did not pass the final M.Sc. All concerned be informed accordingly. Sd/ District Inspector of Schools(SE) Kolkata. Dated, Kolkata 20.05.2013” 4. After considering the certificate issued to the petitioner for obtaining M.Sc. degree in mathematics, I find that there is an error in finding a fact on the part of the respondent no.3. The petitioner did not pass the final M.Sc. examination in the year 2006. So far as the point of law is concerned, it is not in dispute that the West Bengal Schools (Control of Expenditure) Act, 2005 came into force from December 26, 2005. Therefore, this is an admitted position that the above Act having no retrospective effect, it had no manner of application so far as the claim of the petitioner was concerned. The petitioner obtained the above degree prior to the promulgation of the above Act. 5. In view of the above, the decision making process of the respondent no.3 cannot be sustained in law and the same is quashed and set aside. 6. I direct the respondent no.3 to extend the above benefit of post graduate scale of pay in favour of the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of communication of this order including arrears with effect from the date following the last date of M.Sc. Part-II examination of the petitioner together with interest @ 9% on arrear. 7. The respondent no.3 is directed to pay the above interest within the period mentioned hereinabove from the public exchequer at the first instance. 8. The Secretary to the Government of West Bengal, School Education Department is directed to recover the aforesaid amount of interest from the salary of the concerned District Inspector of Schools within three months or by way of raising public demand in case of his retirement and to submit a report to that effect in the office of the Registrar General, Appellate Side, High Court, Calcutta after six months. 9. This writ petition stands disposed of. 10. There will be, however, no order as to costs. 11. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.