Research › Search › Judgment

Gujarat High Court · body

2013 DIGILAW 6 (GUJ)

Amiruddin Chotumiya Shaikh v. State of Gujarat

2013-01-08

N.V.ANJARIA

body2013
ORDER : 1. The present application is filed by the convict-prisoner undergoing sentence for the offences under the NDPS Act, 1985 for temporary release on the ground that he is suffering from heart ailment and wants to have private treatment. On 28.12.2012 this Court observed with reference to the prayer in the application that the applicant shall be continued to be given treatment by the jail authorities for the ailment complained. 2. Today, being the returnable date, application was posted on board. Learned APP Mr. Pujari submitted that the applicant is given proper treatment by the jail authorities. He has produced a certificate dated 3.1.2013 of Medical Officer, Central Jail Dispensary, Ahmedabad, which is taken on record. The certificate in its former part mentions nature of complaints, the treatment accorded time to time accorded to the applicant and the medical investigation performed. The certificate finally states as under: “Considering the reports he was treated accordingly by the go list of Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad. Lastly, he was referred to Urology department, Civil Hospital Ahmedabad on 02.01.2013 for follow up treatment where again USG KUB was performed which suggested NAD and treated accordingly. He was also referred to Cardiology department, U.N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Centre where ECG and 2D Echo were carried out and both the reports are normal and considering the reports the expert cardiologist treated accordingly. This certificate is issued on the basis of the available case records at central jail dispensary.” 3. From the above contents of the certificate, it is seen that the reports of the applicant were found to be normal and he is being treated by the expert cardiologist in the jail. It goes without saying that jail authorities will continue to provide medical care and proper treatment to the applicant. 4. In the facts and circumstances and in the light of the above, no ground can be is said to have been made out for granting temporary bail to the applicant. The application is dismissed. 5. Rule is accordingly discharged.