JUDGMENT 1. - The petitioner-defendant has laid the instant revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for .short, 'C.P.C.') for assailing the impugned order dated 29.1.2013 passed by learned Civil judge (junior Division) Bayana, Bharatpur, rejecting his application under Section 114 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (for short, 'the Act of 1882'). 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the impugned order passed by the learned Court below. The petitioner-defendant has made an endeavour before the learned trial Court by taking shelter of Section 114 of the Act of 1882 that the non-petitioner plaintiff has sought eviction of the petitioners on the ground that the petitioners have committed breach of the express condition of tenancy whereas the fact remains that the petitioner- defendants on many occasions offered the rent but the same as not accepted by the plaintiff-non-petitioner. With these averments in the application, the petitioners sought dismissal of the suit on the anvil of Section 114 of the Act of 1882. 3. The learned trial Court, after hearing the arguments, has concluded that from a bare perusal of the plaint, it is clearly discernible that the plaintiff-non- petitioner has also claimed eviction on the ground of bonafide necessity and for that purpose the tenancy of the petitioners has also been terminated by giving statutory notice under Section 106 of the Act of 1882. With these observations, the learned Court below has rejected the application of the petitioners. 4. In my considered opinion, the learned Court below has not committed any material irregularity or illegality in exercise of its jurisdiction, as such, no interference in the revisional jurisdiction is called for. Moreover, the order impugned in totality has also not occasioned failure of justice. It is a trite law that revisional jurisdiction of this Court enshrined under Section 115 C.P.C. is to be exercised if there is any jurisdictional error committed by the learned Court below. 5. After perusal of the impugned order, I am convinced that the learned Court below has not committed any jurisdictional error in rejecting the application of the petitioners, and so also the order impugned has not occasioned failure of justice. In this of the matter, there is no merit in this revision petition and the same is accordingly dismissed summarily.Revision Dismissed. *******