Judgment :- M. Jaichandren, J. 1. Even though a number of grounds had been raised in the present review petitions, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if this Court is pleased to clarify that the observations made by this Court, in its order, dated 21.11.2012, in M.P.(MD) Nos.2 and 2 of 2012, in W.A.(MD) Nos.965 and 966 of 2012, rejecting the request of the petitioner for being impleaded as a respondent in the Writ Appeals, in W.A.(MD)Nos.965 and 966 of 2012, would not have any bearing on the judgment to be rendered in the civil suits, in O.S.Nos.273 of 2010 and 1065 of 2011, said to be pending on the file of the Sub court, Madurai. 2. The learned counsels appearing for the respondents have no objection for this Court for passing such an order, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, it is made clear that the observations made by this Court, in its order, dated 21.11.2012, in M.P.Nos.2 and 2 of 2012, in W.A.(MD) Nos.965 and 966 of 2012, shall not have any influence or bearing on the decision to be rendered by the Sub-Court Madurai, in O.S.Nos.273 of 2010 and 1065 of 2011. Accordingly, the review petitions stand closed, with the above observations. No costs. Connected M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2012 is closed.