Judgment 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to get set aside the order dated 26.09.2012, passed in E.P.No.268 of 2012 in O.S.NO.717 of 2001 by the learned Principal District Munsif, Thiruchirapalli. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner. 3. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner/judgment debtor would echo the cri de coeur and heart burns of his client to the effect that without notice to the judgment debtor-the revision petitioner herein, straight away the Executing Court ordered delivery; no doubt, the delivery might have been ordered on the ground that the E.P. was filed within two years from the date of decree; however, the Court Amin without even visiting the suit property, simply recorded as though the property was delivered; in fact, in the suit property, the judgment debtor cultivated the paddy crops and it is due for harvest during the second week of January' 2013; hence, this Civil Revision Petition is focussed. 4. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner would also highlight the fact that according to him, the appeal was also filed as against the said original decree. 5. In such a case, I am of the firm view that this Civil Revision Petition is a misconceived one and it is open for the petitioner to approach the Executing Court detailing and delineating the reasons and seek permission for harvesting the crops, if actually it is due ripen for harvest. Over and above that, the remedy is available for the revision petitioner before the Appellate Court also. 6. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs.