Judgment 1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to reject the plaint in O.S.No.393 of 2012, pending before the learned District Munsif, Manapparai. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner. 3. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner would echo the cri de coeur and heart burns of his client to the effect that the plaintiff and the defendants being Muslims, the suit was filed by the plaintiff on the alleged ground that he was the adopted son of the original owner, and adoption is unknown to Muslim Law and hence, the plaint itself has to be quashed. 4. When this Court raised a question as to whether he filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure and raised any objection before the lower Court, in the way known to law, the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner at once would reply by pointing out that when the Muslim Law is very clear on the point of adoption, the question of approaching the trial Court may not arise and straight away, the revision petitioner can approach this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 5. I would like to dispel and disambiguate the ambiguity if any, by pointing that it is a complicate concept as to whether acknowledgment only and not adoption is recognised in Muslim Law and how far the concept adoption could be applied in certain families etc. Hence, this Court by exercising its power under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, cannot simply quash the plaint on the alleged plea as put forth by the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner. 6. With these observations, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs.