Satish Kumar Mittal, J. ( Oral);— The petitioner, who is a resident of village Heeran, Block Ludhiana-I, District Ludhiana, has filed the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to consider her case and to allot her election symbol to enable her to contest the upcoming Panchayat elections for the post of Sarpanch of the village. It is the case of the petitioner that her nomination papers have been wrongly rejected by the Returning Officer. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we are not inclined to entertain this petition, as the election process has already started. The elections are scheduled to be held on July 03, 2013. The petitioner has an effective alternative remedy to challenge the election of the successful candidate on the aforesaid ground. Thus, in view of these facts and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in N.P. Ponnuswami versus Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency and others, AIR 1952 SC 64 ; Boddula Krishnaiah and another versus State Election Commissioner, A.P. and others, (1996) 3 Supreme Court Cases 416; and Election Commission of India versus Ashok Kumar and others, (2000) 8 Supreme Court Cases 216, at this stage, this petition cannot be entertained. Dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy of filing the election petition challenging the election of the successful candidate on the aforesaid ground.