Hon'ble Ravindra Singh,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar Agarwal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. tor the State of U.P. and Sri Manish Chandra Tiwari, learned counsel for the complainant. This petition has been field with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. in case crime no. 219 of 2013 under sections 493 and 506 I.P.C. P.S. Ghosi district Mau. From the perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein a prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no ground for interference in the F.I.R. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F.I.R. is refused. However, it is directed that in case the petitioner appears before the court concerned within 30 days from today and applies for bail, the same shall be heard and disposed of by the courts below in view of the case of Smt. Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2005 Cr.L.J. 755, which has been approved by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Versus State of U.P. reported in 2009(4) S.C.C. 437 . With this direction, this petition is finally disposed of. _____________