Hon'ble S.C. Agarwal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State. There is no need to issue notice to opposite party nos. 2 to 5. The writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the order dated 18.1.2011 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banda in Complaint Case No. 281/IX of 2011, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 IPC, P.S. Kotwali Nagar as well as order dated 26.9.2012 passed by Special Judge (D.A.A), Banda in Criminal Revision No. 49 of 2011, Vimal Prakash Tiwari Vs. State of U.P., under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.. P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District- Banda. The application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner was treated by the Magistrate as a complaint case. The revision filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that in the instant case, learned Magistrate ought to have ordered the registration of the FIR and should have not treated application as complaint. I do not find any force in the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. In Sukhwasi Vs. State of U.P. 2007 (58) ACC (754), a Division Bench of this Court had held that on an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., the Magistrate has got the jurisdiction either to order registration of FIR or to treat the application as a complaint. By treating the application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. as a complaint, the Magistrate has not committed any illegality. I do not find any good ground to interfere in the matter and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. _____________